Changing Revolutions, Changing Attention? Comparing Danish Press Coverage of the Arab Spring in Tunisia and Syria

Authors

  • Mikkel Fugl Eskjær University of Copenhagen

Keywords:

Arab Spring, news media, Danish press, news reporting, content analysis, Syria, Tunisia

Abstract

The Arab Spring has generated unprecedented attention to the Arab world in Western news media. This paper presents a comparative study of Danish press coverage of the uprisings in Tunisia and Syria during the early months of the Arab Spring (January-March 2011). The study is based on a mixed quantitative and qualitative content analysis aimed at identifying patterns of news reporting of the Arab Spring. The investigation looks into whether temporal developments of the Arab revolutions, the level of journalistic presence in the region, and national differences influence Danish press coverage of the Arab Spring. The findings indicate that media coverage of the Arab Spring points in different directions. On the one hand there has been a remarkable increase in media attention to the Middle East in purely quantitative terms. On the other hand the study finds that a number of traditional media patterns persist, not least in relation to media perceptions of Islam and democracy, the Arab-Israeli conflict, and the ability to reform the Arab world from the inside.

Author Biography

Mikkel Fugl Eskjær, University of Copenhagen

Mikkel Fugl Eskjær has an MA degree and a Ph.D. from Dept. of Media, Cognition and Communication, University of Copenhagen. He has been a Visiting Scholar and a postdoc at The Danish Institute in Damascus (2007-2009). Current research areas include: Media sociology, Political communication, Environmental communication, International media systems.

Downloads

How to Cite

Eskjær, M. (2012). Changing Revolutions, Changing Attention? Comparing Danish Press Coverage of the Arab Spring in Tunisia and Syria. Global Media Journal - German Edition, 2(1). Retrieved from https://globalmediajournal.de/index.php/gmj/article/view/124